Datasets have grown from large to massive, and so we increasingly find ourselves refactoring for readability and prioritizing computational efficiency (speed). The computing time for the ever-important sample covariance estimate of a dataset $X \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times p}$, with $n$ observations and $p$ variables is $\mathcal{O}(n p^2)$. Although a single covariance calculation for today’s large datasets is manageable still, it’s computationally prohibitive to use bootstrap, or related resampling methods that require very many repetitions where each repetition demands its own covariance computation. Without fast computation bootstrap remains impractical for high-dimensional problems. And that, we undoubtedly all agree is a tragedy.
So, what can we do restore resampling methods to our toolkit? We can reduce computing times, and appreciably so, if we compute in parallel. We can reduce waiting times from overnight to matters of minutes or seconds even. Related to this, I wrote a post about Randomized Matrix Multiplication where I offer computationally cheaper approximation instead of the exact, but longer to compute procedure.
This post you now read was inspired by a question from Laura Balzano (University of Michigan) who asked if we can’t get an exact solution (rather than an approximation) using parallel computing shown in that other post. I spent some time thinking about it and indeed it’s possible, and valuable. So with that context out of the way, here is the Rython (R + Python) code to calculate the sample covariance estimate in parallel, with some indication for time saved. Use it when you have large matrices and you need the sample covariance matrix or derivative thereof.
